da bet sport： Sri Lanka Cricket sent its top team to the World T20, but player contracts remained unsigned on the eve of their departure to Bangladesh
da aposte e ganhe： Andrew Fidel Fernando15-Mar-2014Sri Lanka contracts issue timeline
2003
SLC agrees to share a percentage of ICC event fees with players
2010-11
SLC runs up debts of almost $70 million as it constructs stadiums for the 2011 World Cup
Feb-Sept 2011
Crippled by debt, SLC is unable to pay cricketers salaries for eight months
March 2012
Players refuse to sign fresh contracts due to a number of contentious clauses
July 2012
The issues are resolved, and the players sign
March 2013
SLC strike the players’ share (25%) of the ICC events fees from the new contracts, which the players refuse to sign. After a 24-hour lockout, chief selector Sanath Jayasuriya mediates negotiations and gets the players to sign on the understanding that the players’ share of the ICC event fees may be reintroduced in future years
January 24, 2014
Players give Jayasuriya a letter demanding 20% of the gross sum paid by the ICC to SLC for global events. Jayasuriya conveys this to the board, which is drawing up the new national contracts
February 27
The contracts list is announced and the contracts are sent to the players in Bangladesh. Upon noting that SLC has not reintroduced any clause that would give the players a cut of the ICC events payment, the players refuse to sign the contracts
March 12
The players meet with SLC to negotiate. The board promises to take the players’ concerns back to the executive committee
March 13
The executive committee proposes an incentive-driven payment system for global events, as a partial sop to player demands
March 14-15
The players maintain their refusal to sign contracts, insisting on a percentage cut from the ICC payment
March 16
The players leave for the World T20, although the contracts remain unsigned
Sri Lanka’s top team departed for the World Twenty20 in Bangladesh on Sunday morning, but the standoff over player contracts persisted, and will now likely only be resolved when the team returns. A board official had offered players an opportunity to sign when the team assembled at SLC’s Maitland Place offices at 4am on Sunday, but the players had refused.*The players had met late on Saturday to discuss their position, but although SLC had issued threats of sending a second-string team to the World T20 earlier in the day, the players maintained their opposition to a contract that does not feature a percentage cut of the payment SLC receives for the team’s participation in global tournaments.On Saturday night, SLC CEO Ashley de Silva indicated the board was content to defer contract negotiations. “If they don’t sign it before they leave, I suppose we will look at it again when they come back,” he said.SLC stands to gain most from its cricketers playing in the tournament unsigned. The board is no longer bound to pay the $500,000 flat fee, nor the two-tiered incentive payments it had offered as part of its revised offer, which was a partial sop to the players’ demand for 20% of the gross sum received by SLC for tournament participation.As had happened in 2012, when contracts were not signed until mid-July, the players may not even receive match fees or regular salaries as long as the contracts remain unsigned. These funds are likely to be retroactively credited when the contracts are agreed to, however.The players had softened their demands by the eve of their departure, asking for 12% of the tournament fee. The ICC is expected to pay SLC approximately $8.9 million for the World T20, meaning the figure the players had held out for, was about $1.07 million. The difference between the guaranteed flat fee the board offered and the percentage sought by the players amounts to about $570,000 for the tournament. But beyond those sums, the players’ objection to SLC’s proposal is largely driven by the belief they are due a percentage of the ICC payment, primarily as compensation for the use of their images in promotional material for global tournaments.Sri Lanka’s players had received a cut of the ICC event fee from 2003 to 2012, until the board struck that payment from player contracts last year. The players’ grievances are also fueled by the complaint that they are being penalised for the administrators’ misuse of finances. The board had run up debts of almost $70 million when they built two new stadia and renovated a third for the 2011 World Cup. Player payment has caused strife at the beginning of every 12-month contracts cycle since then.The present standoff is also believed to have caused conflict within the board. President Jayantha Dharmadasa had been sympathetic to the players’ concerns, but was outmuscled in the board room by an opposing faction.*0600GMT, March 16: The article was updated with the latest on the contracts issues
